Anson v. Third Avenue Railways Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Anson v. Third Avenue Railways Co.

241 A.D. 680

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 680 (Anson v. Third Avenue Railways Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anson v. Third Avenue Railways Co., 241 A.D. 680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, as to the defendant Belt Line Railways Corporation. No opinion. Judgment against the Third Avenue Railways Company reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, without costs. (Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co., 244 N. Y. 84; Doran v. N. Y. City Interborough Ry. Co., 239 id. 448.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, as to the defendant Belt Line Railways Corporation. No opinion. Judgment against the Third Avenue Railways Company reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, without costs. (Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co., 244 N. Y. 84; Doran v. N. Y. City Interborough Ry. Co., 239 id. 448.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anson-v-third-avenue-railways-co-nyappdiv-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack