ANSON BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Henry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

ANSON BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Henry

148 S.E.2d 7, 267 N.C. 253, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1023

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 4, 1966

Docket534

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 148 S.E.2d 7 (ANSON BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ANSON BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Henry, 148 S.E.2d 7, 267 N.C. 253, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1023 (N.C. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s case on appeal contains no assignments of error as required by Rule 19(3), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. Therefore, unless error appears on the face of the record proper, or the issues are insufficient to support the judgment entered, the judgment will be sustained. Bank v. Bryant, 257 N.C. 42, 125 S.E. 2d 291. The issues establish defendant’s indebtedness to plaintiff and are, therefore, clearly sufficient to support the judgment.

Defendant’s evidence in the case on appeal is set out entirely in questions and answers instead of in narrative form as required by Rule 19(4), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. When this rule is ignored, the Court considers only errors presented by the *255 record proper. Amusement Co. v. Tarkington, 251 N.C. 461, 111 S.E. 2d 538. In this case no such errors appear.

The appeal is

Dismissed.

Moore, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI