Anselmo (Michael) Vs. Bisbee
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MICHAEL P. ANSELMO, No. 78576 Petitioner, vs. CONNIE S. BISBEE, CHAIRMAN; SUSAN JACKSON; TONY CORDA; FILED MICHAEL KEELER, AN 0 6 L20 COMMISSIONERS; AND THE NEVADA EL • A. BROM BOARD OF PAROLE CLE COURT
COMMISSIONERS, BY DEPUTY CLERK Res ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
On November 14, 2019, we directed petitioner to show cause why this writ petition should not be dismissed as moot, as it appeared that petitioner had been released from prison. See Univ. & Cnity. Coll. Sys. of Nev. v. Nevadans for Sound Gov't, 120 Nev. 712, 720, 100 P.3d 179, 186 (2004) (recognizing that events subsequent to the district court's decision can render a matter moot). In response, petitioner agreed that this petition is moot and could be dismissed. Therefore, we dismiss this petition. It is so ORDERED.
"Cit6"15jarri.77 Parraguirre
, J. Hardesty Cadish
cc: Attorney General/Carson City Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP/Las Vegas
20 -00WQ
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anselmo (Michael) Vs. Bisbee (Anselmo (Michael) Vs. Bisbee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.