Anselm Holman v. Thomas Page, Menard Correctional Center

102 F.3d 872, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31294, 1996 WL 697872
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided December 3, 1996·No. 95-2758·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ORDER

On consideration of the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc filed by the petitioner-appellant on September 10, 1996, and the answer of the respondent-appellee, a vote of the active members of the court was requested and a majority of the judges in active service have voted to deny a rehearing en banc. All of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing and suggestion of rehearing en bane be, and the same is hereby, DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anselm Holman v. Thomas Page, Menard Correctional Center, 102 F.3d 872, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31294, 1996 WL 697872 (7th Cir. 1996).

102 F.3d 872 (Anselm Holman v. Thomas Page, Menard Correctional Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owens, Anthony v. United States
Seventh Circuit, 2004
Anthony Owens v. United States
387 F.3d 607 (Seventh Circuit, 2004)
Chamblin v. New Hampshire
D. New Hampshire, 1997