Anschutz v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

W.D. Missouri

Anschutz v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

1 F.R.D. 598, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1997

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri

DecidedJanuary 3, 1941

DocketNo. 754

StatusPublished

This text of 1 F.R.D. 598 (Anschutz v. Phillips Petroleum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anschutz v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 1 F.R.D. 598, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1997 (W.D. Mo. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

OTIS, District Judge.

I am satisfied that within the rules governing federal procedure the petition in this case states a cause of action good as against a motion to dismiss. Certainly, however, the plaintiff may be required by a motion for a bill of particulars to make more definite in what respects he charges negligence against the defendant.

The petition to dismiss is overruled. Defendant is given ten days in which to plead further. So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OTIS, District Judge.

I am satisfied that within the rules governing federal procedure the petition in this case states a cause of action good as against a motion to dismiss. Certainly, however, the plaintiff may be required by a motion for a bill of particulars to make more definite in what respects he charges negligence against the defendant.

The petition to dismiss is overruled. Defendant is given ten days in which to plead further. So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 F.R.D. 598, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anschutz-v-phillips-petroleum-co-mowd-1941.