Another Slice, Inc. v. 3620 Broadway Investors LLC
90 A.D.3d 559, 934 N.Y.2d 705
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 2011·Published
Opinion
We agree with both parties that the court properly granted a Yellowstone injunction (see First Natl. Stores v Yellowstone Shopping Ctr., 21 NY2d 630 [1968]), and that dismissal was improper. Gold-Land, Inc. v Haskell (248 AD2d 132 [1998]), on which the court relied, presents the opposite factual scenario and gives no support for dismissal. In Gold-Land, dismissal was appropriate because Supreme Court denied Yellowstone relief. Concur — Saxe, J.P, Catterson, Moskowitz, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Another Slice, Inc. v. 3620 Broadway Investors LLC, 90 A.D.3d 559, 934 N.Y.2d 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
90 A.D.3d 559 (Another Slice, Inc. v. 3620 Broadway Investors LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
First National Stores, Inc. v. Yellowstone Shopping Center, Inc.
237 N.E.2d 868 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)
Gold-Land, Inc. v. Haskell
248 A.D.2d 132 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)