Anostario v. Vicinanzo

60 A.D.2d 674, 400 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14689
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anostario v. Vicinanzo. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 A.D.2d 406

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered March 1, 1976 in Montgomery County, upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term, without a jury. This case was decided by this court in an opinion appearing in 56 AD2d 406, one Justice dissenting. The facts and circumstances are amply set forth therein. We granted reargument to the defendants to be addressed to the issue of whether the part performance exception to the Statute of Frauds should be applied in the instant case. Upon reargument and consideration of the issues presented, we adhere to our original decision. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Mahoney, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anostario v. Vicinanzo, 60 A.D.2d 674, 400 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

60 A.D.2d 674 (Anostario v. Vicinanzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anostario v. Vicinanzo
56 A.D.2d 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)