Anonymous

1 Va. Cas. 139
CourtGeneral Court of Virginia
DecidedJuly 1, 1803
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Va. Cas. 139 (Anonymous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anonymous, 1 Va. Cas. 139 (Va. Super. Ct. 1803).

Opinion

The District Court of Rredericksburg, at its fall term, in 1803, adjourned to the general court this question, “whether an attorney for the commonwealth, in a district court, hath right and authority to discontinue prosecutions, on penal statutes, for misdemeanors, and in criminal cases, without previously obtaining the leave of the court for that purpose.” The general court consisting of five judges, at the fall term of 1803, unanimously decided, “that the district court attorney has not a right to enter a noli prosequi, in any case without the consent of the court first had.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Va. Cas. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anonymous-vagensess-1803.