Anonymous

1 F. Cas. 996
CourtUnited States Circuit Court
DecidedApril 15, 1797
StatusPublished

This text of 1 F. Cas. 996 (Anonymous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anonymous, 1 F. Cas. 996 (uscirct 1797).

Opinion

PETERS, District Judge.

I have no doubt of the power of the court to order a tales in special jury causes. It might have been done, I think, under the act of assembly; but unquestionably it may be done under the act of congress. There ought, however, to be such a discretion in using it, as to prevent any injury to either party; and, therefore, a trial should not be forced on, without a reasonable delay to bring in the jurors that had been regularly selected.

IREDELL, Circuit Justice.

The act of congress seems to remove every difficulty. It makes no distinction (and the court can, therefore, make none) between the case of a special and of a common jury. If this provision had not existed, the subject would have occasioned much doubt in my mind.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F. Cas. 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anonymous-uscirct-1797.