Anonymous

28 U.S. 397, 7 L. Ed. 719, 3 Pet. 397, 1830 U.S. LEXIS 545
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 20, 1830
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 U.S. 397 (Anonymous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anonymous, 28 U.S. 397, 7 L. Ed. 719, 3 Pet. 397, 1830 U.S. LEXIS 545 (1830).

Opinion

MR WIRT moved the court to order copies of the opinion of the court delivered at this term in the case of Shanks et al. Dupont et ¿1., ante 242,. to be certified With the'judg-, ment of the court; under the seal of the court.. . He stated, that he made, the application on behalf of a gentleman who was interested in a case depending, in England, upon similar principles with those decided, in the case referred to ; and the object; Was to lay the proceedings of this court, in an authenticated form, before the coürt in Great. Britain, which was to decide, the .case, depending there.

Mr Chief Justice. Marshajel said, that the Reporter of the court is the proper person to give copies of the opinions delivered by the court. 'The opinions were delivered to him after they were read, and not to. the Clerk, and they were not therefore in his office to be copied.. Not being filed in the clerk’s office, he cofild not-certify copies of the.opinions under the seal of the court.

If an authenticated, copy of the opinion of the. court is desired, the Reporter only could'furnish it, certifieá; arid the Clerk of the court may certify,' under the seal of the court, that he is the Reporter ; if this should, also be. required.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strauss v. Magana
S.D. California, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S. 397, 7 L. Ed. 719, 3 Pet. 397, 1830 U.S. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anonymous-scotus-1830.