Anonymous

1 Duer 596
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anonymous. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Duer 613
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided July 1, 1852·Published

Opinion

Duer, J.

With all possible respect for the judge who made the decision that has been cited, it is impossible for me to follow it. I cannot say that a day, appointed for a hearing before a referee, is a circuit or term, general or special, or that his private docket, if he keeps any, is a calendar. In order to meet a supposed equity, I cannot stretch a statutory provision to a case which its terms cannot, without violence, be made to embrace. If there is a casus omissus-, the Legislature must supply it.

Even were the terms of the Code so ambiguous, that by a possible construction they might cover the rejected charge, I still should bé very unwilling to allow it. Proceedings before referees, as usually conducted, are sufficiently protracted and expensive, and it is not at all desirable to increase the temptations to delay. I must affirm the decision of the clerk.

Oaklet, Ch. J., and Bosworth, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anonymous, 1 Duer 596 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1852).

1 Duer 596 (Anonymous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.