Anonymous

6 Cow. 389
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1826·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Curia.

For both reasons, the motion must be denied. Owing to the looseness of the practice in these respects, heretofore, parties have taken very great latitude in stating the number of witnesses on both sides. We think it proper to require that they should not only name their witnesses ; but we now require them to swear that, as they are advised by counsel, and believe, they cannot safely proceed to trial, without each of the witnesses named.

Motion denied with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anonymous, 6 Cow. 389 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1826).

6 Cow. 389 (Anonymous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapin v. Overin
25 N.Y.S. 627 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)