Anonymous

1 Cow. 60

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anonymous. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 Cow. 1 →

New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1823·Published

Opinion

Curia.

This is not necessary, on an application requiring the plaintiff to give security for costs, x

Seelye, said the rule, requiring security, applies only to cases of absence from the state. (Pfister & M'Comb v. Gillespie, 2 John. Cas. 109.)

We consider this application as standing upon the same ground/ The plaintiff is equally out of the reach of execution, as if absent from the state,

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia.

This is not necessary, on an application requiring the plaintiff to give security for costs, x

Seelye, said the rule, requiring security, applies only to cases of absence from the state. (Pfister & M'Comb v. Gillespie, 2 John. Cas. 109.)

We consider this application as standing upon the same ground/ The plaintiff is equally out of the reach of execution, as if absent from the state,

Motion granted.

Anonymous, 1 Cow. 60 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

Pincite

1 Cow. 60 (Anonymous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.