Anonymous

1 F. Cas. 1016
District Court, N.D. New York·Decided July 1, 1845·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CONKLING, District Judge,

said he had never entertained any doubt on the point, but had uniformly been of opinion that the opposing creditor was to be considered as holding the affirmative of the issue, and ought to begin. The granting of a discharge was a matter of course,unless objections were affirmatively interposed and affirmatively sustained by evidence. In such a proceeding, the objector was the actor, and the bankrupt stood on the defensive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anonymous, 1 F. Cas. 1016 (N.D.N.Y. 1845).

1 F. Cas. 1016 (Anonymous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jorgenson
241 F. 412 (W.D. Michigan, 1916)