Anonymous

3 N.C. 5
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anonymous. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 N.C. 226
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided November 5, 1797·Published

Opinion

This bond is not made payable in South Carolina. If it were, yet as it was executed here, it shall only carry North Carolina interest. A contract is to be interpreted according to the law of the country where made, and draws to it such legal consequences as the law of that country attaches to it. Had the bond been executed in South Carolina, and there payable, it would undergo a different consideration.

NOTE. — See Kaighn v. Kennedy, 1 N.C. 37. *Page 20

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anonymous, 3 N.C. 5 (N.C. Ct. App. 1797).

3 N.C. 5 (Anonymous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.