Anonymous
This text of 2 Mich. N.P. 118 (Anonymous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 2nd Circuit of Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[119]*119 By the Court,
This case comes here on special appeal from Justice’s Court.
Proceedings were commenced by attachment. The affidavit stated, “Deponent believes defendant is about to abscond,” &c.
By C. L., § 3670, the deponent must swear that he “ knows, or has good reason to believe,” &e. Thisrequires. deponent to depose-as to facts and belief. . Where deponent may-swear to good reasons,he must also depose that he believes them. See Stevenson vs. Robbins, 5 Mis., 18; Drake on Attachment, § 106.
For these reasons the affidavit is a nullity, and the Justice acquired no jurisdiction. The bond had but one surety. This bond is irregular, but the defect- is not jurisdictional and may be amended. The justice held otherwise, which is error.
The writ must be quashed with costs.
I can -not let this occasion pass without noticing a defect which is bad'practice The motion in this case does not specifically point out the errors, and if the objections had not been fundamental I might perhaps.have felt it my duty to hold the motion insufficient, because indefinite. The reasons- why an affidavit is void should be stated tersely and definitely, so that no oral additions are necessary to know what the mover finds fault with. It seems the errors were pointed out to the Justice, who disregarded them.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Mich. N.P. 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anonymous-micirct2-1871.