Anonymous

76 Me. 207
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 Me. 207 (Anonymous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anonymous, 76 Me. 207 (Me. 1884).

Opinion

Per curiam.

It is the opinion of the court that, where two or more persons are jointly indicted for a capital felony, and are, by order of court, tried jointly, and on application therefor the court assigns different counsel for each, the judge presiding has authority, under the statute, to allow not exceeding one hundred and fifty dollars in all for the services of counsel for any one trial, including services upon appeal or upon exceptions before the law court.

Agreed to at Law Term, Middle District, 1884.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brown
357 P.2d 1072 (California Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Me. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anonymous-me-1884.