Anonymous
8 Mass. 370
Opinion
We can give no such advice. This paper was intrusted to Mr. Dane, as a counsellor or an attorney of the Court. It is in the keeping of his c^ent, as much as if it were in his own pocket [310] Non constat that it will ever be produced. The party may repent of his ill intention, and any crime contemplated may never be com mitted.
Note. — It seemed to be understood that this paper was a forged note, upon which the grand jury might have founded an indictment against Mr. D.’s client.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anonymous, 8 Mass. 370 (Mass. 1811).
8 Mass. 370 (Anonymous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Petition of Snow
70 A. 120 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1908)
Clarke v. Davis
1 Redf. 249 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1863)
Coveney v. Tannahill
1 Hill & Den. 33 (New York Supreme Court, 1841)
Brown v. Payson
6 N.H. 443 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1833)
Durkee v. Leland
4 Vt. 612 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1832)
Foster v. Hall
29 Mass. 89 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1832)