Anonymous

3 Day 308
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut·Decided April 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The Court

would not continue the cause; and took the opportunity to observe, that there was manifest uy¡jjty |n counter affidavits, as was evident from the J present instance. They said, however, that counter affidavits should not deny the materiality of the evidence eXpected from the witness, but might stale any circum-r . stances, that rendered it impossible, or improbable, that . , , , .... , . his testimony could be procured within a reasonable time.

Ebwakds. J.

said, that the English practice was lame in this respect; that it threw great power into the hands of a party ; and that this court was perfectly free to establish a bctc f'uctH.o [Ie added, that the whole English piaciiee oí admitting aiuuavits was moatm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anonymous, 3 Day 308 (circtdct 1809).

3 Day 308 (Anonymous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Cleveland
160 S.W. 868 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1913)
Lane v. State
54 S.W. 870 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1899)
Murry v. State
1 Tex. Ct. App. 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1876)
Hyde v. State
16 Tex. 445 (Texas Supreme Court, 1856)