Anon

19 Wend. 225
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1838
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 Wend. 225 (Anon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anon, 19 Wend. 225 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1838).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where the judgment affirmed was ren dered after verdict, the statute authorizes the court in its discretion to give judgment that the defendant in error recover twice the amount of his taxed bill of costs, 2 R. S. 618, § 33 ; and where the plaintiff in error in such case suffers a default on the cause being called on the calendar, we have directed a rule to be entered accordingly. But a judgment on a report of referees is not within the terms of the statute, and statutes giving costs are always construed strictly. The motion cannot be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shields v. Lozear
34 N.J.L. 530 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1870)
Tillou v. Sparks
9 How. Pr. 465 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Wend. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anon-nysupct-1838.