Anomymous
1 Thompson 81
Opinion
The Court
refused to entertain tbe motion ? on tbe ground that tbe writ of error was a writ . issuing of course, and that tbe Court could take no action upon it, any more than upon any other process issuing of right out of the Clerk’s office.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anomymous, 1 Thompson 81 (Tenn. 1851).
1 Thompson 81 (Anomymous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miles 933948 v. Scanlon
W.D. Michigan, 2021
Page v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation
381 S.W.2d 949 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Morris v. Lain
180 S.E. 206 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1935)
Pee Dee Naval Stores Co. v. Hamer
75 S.E. 695 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
State ex rel. Savings Trust Co. v. Hallen
146 S.W. 1171 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1912)
Diseker v. Eau Claire Land & Improvement Co.
68 S.E. 529 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1910)
State ex rel. O'Malley v. Musick
130 S.W. 398 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
United States v. Tallmadge
91 P. 729 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1907)
State ex rel. Phillips v. Green
90 S.W. 403 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Hall v. State
134 Ala. 90 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1901)
Kent v. Board of Commissioners
42 Kan. 534 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1889)