Anolik v. Marcovsky
This text of 186 A. 418 (Anolik v. Marcovsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Gray of the court below. The facts as stated in that opinion distinguish this case from Altman v. Standard Refrigerator Co., 315 Pa. 465, 173 A. 411; Werner v. Bowers, 318 Pa. 518, 178 A. 831; and Alianell v. Hoffman, 317 Pa. 148, 176 A. 207, recently decided by the Supreme Court, and relied on by appellant. MacDonald v. Schroeder, 214 Pa. 411, 63 A. 1024; Randall v. Fenton Storage Co., 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 212, 177 A. 575, and Farneth v. Commercial Credit Co., 313 Pa. 433, 169 A. 89, give support to the ruling of the court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 A. 418, 122 Pa. Super. 133, 1936 Pa. Super. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anolik-v-marcovsky-pasuperct-1936.