Anolik v. Marcovsky

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Anolik v. Marcovsky

186 A. 418, 122 Pa. Super. 133, 1936 Pa. Super. LEXIS 76

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 6, 1936·No. Appeal, 41·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Gray of the court below. The facts as stated in that opinion distinguish this case from Altman v. Standard Refrigerator Co., 315 Pa. 465, 173 A. 411; Werner v. Bowers, 318 Pa. 518, 178 A. 831; and Alianell v. Hoffman, 317 Pa. 148, 176 A. 207, recently decided by the Supreme Court, and relied on by appellant. MacDonald v. Schroeder, 214 Pa. 411, 63 A. 1024; Randall v. Fenton Storage Co., 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 212, 177 A. 575, and Farneth v. Commercial Credit Co., 313 Pa. 433, 169 A. 89, give support to the ruling of the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Gray of the court below. The facts as stated in that opinion distinguish this case from Altman v. Standard Refrigerator Co., 315 Pa. 465, 173 A. 411; Werner v. Bowers, 318 Pa. 518, 178 A. 831; and Alianell v. Hoffman, 317 Pa. 148, 176 A. 207, recently decided by the Supreme Court, and relied on by appellant. MacDonald v. Schroeder, 214 Pa. 411, 63 A. 1024; Randall v. Fenton Storage Co., 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 212, 177 A. 575, and Farneth v. Commercial Credit Co., 313 Pa. 433, 169 A. 89, give support to the ruling of the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Anolik v. Marcovsky, 186 A. 418, 122 Pa. Super. 133, 1936 Pa. Super. LEXIS 76 (Pa. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

186 A. 418 (Anolik v. Marcovsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related