Annunziata v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Annunziata v. City of New York

221 A.D.2d 436, 633 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11850

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1995·Published

Opinion

—In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated March 3, 1994, which granted the application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the petitioners’ application for leave to serve a late notice of claim (see, Ortega v New York City Hous. Auth., 167 AD2d 337). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated March 3, 1994, which granted the application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the petitioners’ application for leave to serve a late notice of claim (see, Ortega v New York City Hous. Auth., 167 AD2d 337). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Annunziata v. City of New York, 221 A.D.2d 436, 633 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

221 A.D.2d 436 (Annunziata v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related