Anniston Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Hughes

148 So. 124, 226 Ala. 654, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 411
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMarch 30, 1933
Docket7 Div. 176.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 148 So. 124 (Anniston Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anniston Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Hughes, 148 So. 124, 226 Ala. 654, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 411 (Ala. 1933).

Opinion

KNIGHT, Justice.

The complaint in this cause is composed of four common counts, and the record shows that the defendant demurred to the complaint, and to each count thereof separately and severally. On this appeal, the appellant, defendant in the court below, has assigned for error the overruling of his demurrer to each separate count of the complaint. However, in its brief, no argument is submitted in support of these assignments of error, or of any one of them. Under our uniform rulings we will treat those assignments of error as waived. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Hall, 223 Ala. 338, 135 So. 466; Keeton v. Northern Alabama R. R. Co., 222 Ala. 224, 132 So. 35.

There is no bill of exceptions in this cause, hence we cannot here review the action of the trial court in giving the charge, at request of the plaintiff, which is made the basis of appellant’s fifth assignment of error. Nor can we review, for like reason, the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for new trial. Such errors can only be presented by proper bill of exceptions. •

It follows that the judgment appealed from will be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and THOMAS, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellard v. J. Blach & Sons
103 So. 2d 713 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Wenck v. Insurance Agents Fin. Corp.
99 So. 2d 883 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Rose v. Magro
3 So. 2d 64 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1941)
Protective Life Ins. Co. v. Wallace
161 So. 256 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 So. 124, 226 Ala. 654, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anniston-lumber-mfg-co-v-hughes-ala-1933.