Anniston Auto Co. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 689
This text of 4 B.T.A. 689 (Anniston Auto Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Anniston Auto Co. v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 689 (bta 1926).
Opinions
OPINION.
: The decision in this appeal is governed by the Appeal of Thomas Shoe Co., 1 B. T. A. 124; and Appeal of Bell-Rogers & Zemurray Brothers Co., ante, p. 687. The contribution was not an ordinary and necessary business expense.
Order of redetermination mil be entered on 10 days’ notice, under Rule 50.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 B.T.A. 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anniston-auto-co-v-commissioner-bta-1926.