Anniston Auto Co. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 689, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2227
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided August 2, 1926·No. Docket No. 1335.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
OPINION.
: The decision in this appeal is governed by the Appeal of Thomas Shoe Co., 1 B. T. A. 124; and Appeal of Bell-Rogers & Zemurray Brothers Co., ante, p. 687. The contribution was not an ordinary and necessary business expense.
Order of redetermination mil be entered on 10 days’ notice, under Rule 50.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anniston Auto Co. v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 689, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2227 (bta 1926).
4 B.T.A. 689 (Anniston Auto Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anniston Auto Co. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 689 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)