Annis v. Nicolopoulas
This text of 265 A.D. 944 (Annis v. Nicolopoulas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The first cause of action clearly states an action for the breach of a contract of partnership and for an accounting. It is not necessary to allege due performance by plaintiffs. (Cahill v. Haff, 248 N. Y. 377.) Appellants do not present any points with respect to the second Cause of action. Furthermore, there is no provision of the bill of sale annexed to the complaint under which defendant Nicolopoulas covenanted and agreed not to establish directly or indirectly any similar business, the breach of which alleged covenant is the basis of the second cause of action. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 A.D. 944, 38 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/annis-v-nicolopoulas-nyappdiv-1942.