Annis v. Nicolopoulas

265 A.D. 944, 38 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6668

This text of 265 A.D. 944 (Annis v. Nicolopoulas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Annis v. Nicolopoulas, 265 A.D. 944, 38 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

The first cause of action clearly states an action for the breach of a contract of partnership and for an accounting. It is not necessary to allege due performance by plaintiffs. (Cahill v. Haff, 248 N. Y. 377.) Appellants do not present any points with respect to the second Cause of action. Furthermore, there is no provision of the bill of sale annexed to the complaint under which defendant Nicolopoulas covenanted and agreed not to establish directly or indirectly any similar business, the breach of which alleged covenant is the basis of the second cause of action. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cahill v. Haff
162 N.E. 288 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 944, 38 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/annis-v-nicolopoulas-nyappdiv-1942.