Annis v. Gang

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Annis v. Gang

160 So. 2d 171

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 4, 1964

DocketNo. 63-434

StatusPublished

This text of 160 So. 2d 171 (Annis v. Gang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Annis v. Gang, 160 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal seeks review of an order granting a new trial to the appellee, after a favorable jury verdict had been rendered for the appellant.

In granting the new trial, no ground was stated in the order. Failure to state a ground is contrary to the provisions of § 59.07(4), Fla.Stat, F.S.A. and Rule 2.8(f), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 F.S.A. Therefore, the order of the trial court granting a new trial be and the same is hereby reversed. See: Fulton v. Poston Bridge and Iron, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 240; Gaskill v. Montague, Fla.App. 1961, 128 So.2d 420; Webb’s City, Inc. v. Lugerner, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 531; A & P Bakery Supply and Equipment Co. v. H. Plexter & Son, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 149 So.2d 883. This cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of entering an order reinstating the judgment in favor of the appellant.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal seeks review of an order granting a new trial to the appellee, after a favorable jury verdict had been rendered for the appellant.

In granting the new trial, no ground was stated in the order. Failure to state a ground is contrary to the provisions of § 59.07(4), Fla.Stat, F.S.A. and Rule 2.8(f), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 F.S.A. Therefore, the order of the trial court granting a new trial be and the same is hereby reversed. See: Fulton v. Poston Bridge and Iron, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 240; Gaskill v. Montague, Fla.App. 1961, 128 So.2d 420; Webb’s City, Inc. v. Lugerner, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 531; A & P Bakery Supply and Equipment Co. v. H. Plexter & Son, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 149 So.2d 883. This cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of entering an order reinstating the judgment in favor of the appellant.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 So. 2d 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/annis-v-gang-fladistctapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack