Annika Royston v. HHA- Oxford Place
Opinion
Opinion issued July 14, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00399-CV ——————————— ANNIKA ROYSTON, Appellant V. HHA-OXFORD PLACE, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1272209
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The only issue in a forcible-detainer action is the right to actual possession of
the subject property and “the merits of title shall not be adjudicated.” Wilhelm v.
Fed. Nat. Mortg. Ass’n, 349 S.W.3d 766, 768 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.]
2011, no pet.). A forcible-detainer appeal therefore becomes moot if the appellant is no longer in possession of the property, unless the appellant holds and asserts “a
potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession” of the property.
Marshall v. Housing Auth. of the City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 786–87 (Tex.
2006).
The record contains an executed and returned writ of possession indicating
that appellants no longer possess the disputed property. This Court issued a letter
informing appellants that the record indicated that the appeal is moot because
appellee now has possession of the subject property. We requested that appellants
file a response to whether the appeal was moot. Appellants did not respond, and
therefore, have failed to assert a potentially meritorious claim of right to current,
actual possession of the property. See Soza v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp., No.
01-11-00568-CV, 2013 WL 3148616, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June
18, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.).
Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the case as
moot. See Bey v. ASD Fin., Inc., No. 05-14-00534-CV, 2014 WL 4180933, at *1
(Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 11, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal of
forcible detainer action as moot because appellant no longer possessed property at
issue); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Morgan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Annika Royston v. HHA- Oxford Place (Annika Royston v. HHA- Oxford Place) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.