Annie L. Hill v. Merit Systems Protection Board
This text of 57 F.3d 1082 (Annie L. Hill v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
57 F.3d 1082
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Annie L. HILL, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
No. 94-3522.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 1, 1995.
36 F.3d 1113.
MOTION GRANTED.
ORDER
Respondent Merit Systems Protection Board moves for a remand of this case for consideration on the merits. The petitioner does not oppose.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F.3d 1082, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25659, 1995 WL 105692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/annie-l-hill-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-1995.