Annie Ellenberger v. Earl Warren, James R. Agee, A. F. Bray, Raymond Peters and Edmund G. Brown

199 F.2d 664
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 5, 1952
Docket13237
StatusPublished

This text of 199 F.2d 664 (Annie Ellenberger v. Earl Warren, James R. Agee, A. F. Bray, Raymond Peters and Edmund G. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Annie Ellenberger v. Earl Warren, James R. Agee, A. F. Bray, Raymond Peters and Edmund G. Brown, 199 F.2d 664 (9th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

199 F.2d 664

Annie ELLENBERGER, Appellant,
v.
Earl WARREN, James R. Agee, A. F. Bray, Raymond Peters and Edmund G. Brown, Appellees.

No. 13237.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

November 3, 1952.

Rehearing Denied December 5, 1952.

Mrs. Annie Ellenberger, in pro. per.

Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen. St. of Cal., William M. Bennett, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellees Earl Warren et al.

J. F. Coakley, Dist. Atty. for Alameda County, R. Robert Hunter, Asst. and Richard H. Klippert, Deputy, Oakland, Cal., for appellee James R. Agee.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The district court properly sustained the appellees' motion to dismiss. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 F.2d 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/annie-ellenberger-v-earl-warren-james-r-agee-a-f-bray-raymond-peters-ca9-1952.