Annie East v. Southwest Cimm's Inc. D/B/A Burger King 1002 A/K/A Cimm's Incorporated
Opinion
Opinion issued April 28, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00046-CV ——————————— ANNIE EAST, Appellant V. SOUTHWEST CIMM’S INC. D/B/A BURGER KING #1002 A/K/A CIMM’S INCORPORATED, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 997701
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Annie East, has filed two unopposed motions to dismiss this
appeal, informing the Court that “all matters in controversy” between the parties have been “settled” and “resolved.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). The parties
have agreed that each will bear its own costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).
We grant the motions and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a)(1). We withdraw our August 28, 2014 majority and dissenting opinions
and judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). We dismiss all other pending motions
as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Lloyd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Annie East v. Southwest Cimm's Inc. D/B/A Burger King 1002 A/K/A Cimm's Incorporated (Annie East v. Southwest Cimm's Inc. D/B/A Burger King 1002 A/K/A Cimm's Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.