Annie East v. Southwest Cimm's Inc. D/B/A Burger King 1002 A/K/A Cimm's Incorporated

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 28, 2015·No. 01-13-00046-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued April 28, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00046-CV ——————————— ANNIE EAST, Appellant V. SOUTHWEST CIMM’S INC. D/B/A BURGER KING #1002 A/K/A CIMM’S INCORPORATED, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 997701

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Annie East, has filed two unopposed motions to dismiss this

appeal, informing the Court that “all matters in controversy” between the parties have been “settled” and “resolved.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). The parties

have agreed that each will bear its own costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

We grant the motions and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). We withdraw our August 28, 2014 majority and dissenting opinions

and judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). We dismiss all other pending motions

as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Lloyd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Annie East v. Southwest Cimm's Inc. D/B/A Burger King 1002 A/K/A Cimm's Incorporated, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Annie East v. Southwest Cimm's Inc. D/B/A Burger King 1002 A/K/A Cimm's Incorporated (Annie East v. Southwest Cimm's Inc. D/B/A Burger King 1002 A/K/A Cimm's Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.