Annexstein v. Annexstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Annexstein v. Annexstein

48 A.D.2d 656, 371 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9661

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 656 (Annexstein v. Annexstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Annexstein v. Annexstein, 48 A.D.2d 656, 371 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated February 27, 1975, as, in granting his motion to vacate an inquest and restore the case to the calendar, did so upon condition that he give a $7,800 bond on or before March 14, 1975 to secure future support payments. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. The bond shall be given within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon and the Family Court shall set a date for a new hearing upon fulfillment of the condition that the bond be given. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Martuscello, Latham and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a support proceeding, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated February 27, 1975, as, in granting his motion to vacate an inquest and restore the case to the calendar, did so upon condition that he give a $7,800 bond on or before March 14, 1975 to secure future support payments. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. The bond shall be given within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon and the Family Court shall set a date for a new hearing upon fulfillment of the condition that the bond be given. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Martuscello, Latham and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 656, 371 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/annexstein-v-annexstein-nyappdiv-1975.