Annette Hartmann and Benn J. Hartmann v. United States

419 F.2d 829, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9916
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 26, 1969
Docket22858
StatusPublished

This text of 419 F.2d 829 (Annette Hartmann and Benn J. Hartmann v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Annette Hartmann and Benn J. Hartmann v. United States, 419 F.2d 829, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9916 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants instituted an action in the court below under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 *830 et seq., seeking to recover from the United States damages in excess of $10,000.00 allegedly caused to their residential property by sonic booms.

Following trial to the court on the issue of liability, which included a personal inspection of the damaged property, the district court entered judgment in favor of the United States, based upon detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. In essence the district court found as facts that the appellants failed to establish the identity of the aircraft that created the sonic booms; that there was negligence; and that the damage to the appellants' residential property was caused by the sonic booms.

A careful examination of the record discloses that the findings of fact are substantially supported by the evidence, and are far from being clearly erroneous. The application of the clearly erroneous rule to this case, adversely to appellants’ contentions, disposes of all questions on appeal presented by appellants which merit attention.

° Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States as defendant
28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 F.2d 829, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/annette-hartmann-and-benn-j-hartmann-v-united-states-ca9-1969.