Annett-Mahnken Realty Co. v. Gollin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Annett-Mahnken Realty Co. v. Gollin

136 A. 924, 100 N.J. Eq. 556, 15 Stock. 556, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 658

DecidedJanuary 31, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A. 924 (Annett-Mahnken Realty Co. v. Gollin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Annett-Mahnken Realty Co. v. Gollin, 136 A. 924, 100 N.J. Eq. 556, 15 Stock. 556, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 658 (N.J. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the state of the ease, sent up with the present appeal, leads us to the conclusion that none of the grounds upon which we are asked to reverse the order under review have legal merit.

The order appealed from will be affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Trenohard, Min-TURN, KALISCH, KaTZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, YAN Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the state of the ease, sent up with the present appeal, leads us to the conclusion that none of the grounds upon which we are asked to reverse the order under review have legal merit.

The order appealed from will be affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Trenohard, Min-TURN, KALISCH, KaTZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, YAN Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A. 924, 100 N.J. Eq. 556, 15 Stock. 556, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/annett-mahnken-realty-co-v-gollin-nj-1927.