Annett-Mahnken Realty Co. v. Gollin
136 A. 924, 100 N.J. Eq. 556, 15 Stock. 556, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 658
Opinion
Our examination of the state of the ease, sent up with the present appeal, leads us to the conclusion that none of the grounds upon which we are asked to reverse the order under review have legal merit.
The order appealed from will be affirmed.
For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Trenohard, Min-TURN, KALISCH, KaTZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, YAN Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Annett-Mahnken Realty Co. v. Gollin, 136 A. 924, 100 N.J. Eq. 556, 15 Stock. 556, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 658 (N.J. 1927).
136 A. 924 (Annett-Mahnken Realty Co. v. Gollin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.