Anne Mercer v. Drohan Management Group, Inc.
This text of 475 F. App'x 848 (Anne Mercer v. Drohan Management Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Anne Mercer appeals the district court’s orders granting Drohan Management Group, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment and denying Mercer’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) motion in this action brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C §§ 12101-12213. Having reviewed and considered the record, briefs, and applicable law, we are persuaded that the district court reached the correct result on the merits of each of Mercer’s claims pressed on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment based substantially on the reasoning set forth in the district court’s careful and thorough opinions. Mercer v. Drohan Management Group, Inc., No. 1:10—cv-1212, 2011 WL 5975234 (E.D.Va. November 28, 2011); Mercer v. Drohan Management Group, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-1212 (E.D.Va. February 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 F. App'x 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anne-mercer-v-drohan-management-group-inc-ca4-2012.