Anne Mercer v. Drohan Management Group, Inc.

475 F. App'x 848
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 23, 2012
Docket12-1300
StatusUnpublished

This text of 475 F. App'x 848 (Anne Mercer v. Drohan Management Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anne Mercer v. Drohan Management Group, Inc., 475 F. App'x 848 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anne Mercer appeals the district court’s orders granting Drohan Management Group, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment and denying Mercer’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) motion in this action brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C §§ 12101-12213. Having reviewed and considered the record, briefs, and applicable law, we are persuaded that the district court reached the correct result on the merits of each of Mercer’s claims pressed on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment based substantially on the reasoning set forth in the district court’s careful and thorough opinions. Mercer v. Drohan Management Group, Inc., No. 1:10—cv-1212, 2011 WL 5975234 (E.D.Va. November 28, 2011); Mercer v. Drohan Management Group, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-1212 (E.D.Va. February 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 F. App'x 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anne-mercer-v-drohan-management-group-inc-ca4-2012.