Anne McCaleb v. Antoniette Descisciolo and Robert Rozean

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 18, 2005
Docket12-05-00122-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Anne McCaleb v. Antoniette Descisciolo and Robert Rozean (Anne McCaleb v. Antoniette Descisciolo and Robert Rozean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anne McCaleb v. Antoniette Descisciolo and Robert Rozean, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                     NO. 12-05-00122-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT


TYLER, TEXAS



ANNE MCCALEB,                                            §     APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

APPELLANT


V.                                                                         §     JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF


ANTONIETTE DESCISCIOLO

AND ROBERT ROZEAN,                                 §     SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEES





MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

            This pro se appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). On March 14, 2005, Appellant filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Rule 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court’s judgment.

            On April 13, 2005, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rule 25.1(e). She was further notified that unless she filed an amended notice of appeal on or before May 13, 2005, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). To date, Appellant has neither complied with nor responded to our notice.

            Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to correct her defective notice of appeal, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App.

 P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, 12-04-00004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.–Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v. Hubert, 12-03-00442-CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.–Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied).

Opinion delivered May 18, 2005.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.



(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anne McCaleb v. Antoniette Descisciolo and Robert Rozean, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anne-mccaleb-v-antoniette-descisciolo-and-robert-r-texapp-2005.