Annabella Pinera v. Target/Sedgwick CMS

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 2016·No. 15-4077·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

ANNABELLA PINERA, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 1D15-4077

TARGET/SEDGWICK CMS, CORRECTED PAGES: pg 1 CORRECTION IS UNDERLINED IN Appellees. RED MAILED: October 7, 2016

BY: KMS

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Marjorie Renee Hill, Judge.

Date of Accident: August 24, 2012. Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

David S. Gold and David B. Stauber of Litchfield Cavo, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellees.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In light of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Westphal v. City of St.

Petersburg, 194 So. 3d 311 (Fla. 2016), Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing filed June 9, 2016, is granted, and our opinion rendered June 7, 2016, is withdrawn. This matter

is remanded to the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) for reconsideration consistent with Westphal. The JCC also shall determine whether additional defenses asserted by the Appellees, if any, are appropriately raised and resolved under the circumstances of this case and the material change in the law represented by Westphal.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WETHERELL and KELSEY, JJ., and DEMPSEY, ANGELA C., Associate Judge, CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Annabella Pinera v. Target/Sedgwick CMS, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Annabella Pinera v. Target/Sedgwick CMS (Annabella Pinera v. Target/Sedgwick CMS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related