Anna May Beck v. The Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Company, Inc., a Corporation

220 F.2d 830, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 150, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3447
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 1955
Docket12209_1
StatusPublished

This text of 220 F.2d 830 (Anna May Beck v. The Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Company, Inc., a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anna May Beck v. The Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Company, Inc., a Corporation, 220 F.2d 830, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 150, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3447 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, two elderly ladies, were riding at a moderate rate of speed on Arlington Boulevard, a dual highway, on a bright, clear afternoon in July, 1951. Anna May Beck was a passenger in her 1937 automobile, which was being driven for her by her sister Xenia.

A car ahead of them pulled to the left and went around a bus, which had lawfully stopped to pick up and discharge passengers. But the Beck automobile crashed against the rear of the bus and the two ladies sustained injuries. At the conclusion of their evidence in this suit against the bus company, the trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant. This appeal is from the judgment entered thereon.

Miss Xenia testified that the lane to her left was clear of traffic. Nevertheless, instead of following the example of the car ahead in turning to the left, she drove straight on and hit the bus, which she had not seen until the first car turned. Her clear negligence was properly imputed to her sister, for whom she was acting and who had the right of control. Bernhardt v. City & S. Ry. Co., 1920, 49 App.D.C. 265, 263 F. 1009; cf. Baber v. Akers Motor Lines, 1954, 94 U.S.App.D.C.-, 215 F.2d 843. No negligence on the part of the bus company was shown.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baber v. Akers Motor Lines, Inc.
215 F.2d 843 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)
Bernhardt v. City & S. Ry. Co.
263 F. 1009 (D.C. Circuit, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 F.2d 830, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 150, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anna-may-beck-v-the-washington-virginia-maryland-coach-company-inc-a-cadc-1955.