Anna Marie Casas v. Vencelao Laureano
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00052-CV
Anna Marie Casas, Appellant
v.
Vencelao Laureano, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 247,727, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant filed her notice of appeal on January 23, 2015. On March 16 and 18, the
trial court clerk and court reporter informed us that appellant had not paid for the record and that
they had been informed that appellant intended to dismiss her appeal. On March 23, appellant’s
attorney confirmed that appellant did not wish to continue with her appeal, stating that he would file
a motion to dismiss with the Court. On April 13, after hearing nothing further, we sent counsel
notice that the record was overdue and that the appeal would be dismissed if we did not receive a
response by April 23. To date, counsel has not responded or filed a motion to dismiss. We therefore
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). __________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: May 8, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anna Marie Casas v. Vencelao Laureano (Anna Marie Casas v. Vencelao Laureano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.