Anna Maria Salinas Saenz v. Thorp Petroleum Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 13, 2015·No. 04-14-00527-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 04-14-00527-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 1/13/2015 4:09:00 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK

NO. 04-14-00527-CV __________________________________________________________________ FILED IN IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 01/13/2015 4:09:00 PM __________________________________________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk ANNA MARIA SALINAS SAENZ, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

THORP PETROLEUM CORP., ET AL., Appellees __________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the 229th District Court of Starr County, Texas No. DC-04-120, Hon. Ana Lisa Garza, Presiding __________________________________________________________________ APPELLEES’ UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEES’ BRIEFS SCOTT, DOUGLASS, & JONES GILL LLP MCCONNICO, L.L.P. Lee S. Gill Mark W. Hanna State Bar No. 07921360 State Bar No. 24051764 info@jonesgill.com mhanna@scottdoug.com 6363 Woodway, Suite 1100 Kennon L. Wooten Houston, Texas 77057 State Bar No. 24046624 (713) 652-4068 Telephone kwooten@scottdoug.com (713) 651-0716 Facsimile 600 Congress Avenue, Suite 1500 Austin, Texas 78701-2589 Attorney for Appellees Thorp (512) 495-6300 Telephone Petroleum Corporation, El Paso (512) 474-0731 Facsimile Production Company; El Paso E&P Company, LP; El Paso Exploration & Production Management, Inc.; Attorneys for Appellee Stanco Land Management, LLC, and Smith Production Inc. Meredith Land & Minerals Company

January 13, 2015

1173696 TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b), Appellees Smith

Production Inc. (“Smith Production”) and Thorp Petroleum Corporation, El Paso

Production Company; El Paso E&P Company, LP; El Paso Exploration &

Production Management, Inc.; Stanco Land Management, LLC; and Meredith

Land & Minerals Company (together “Thorp et al.” and collectively with Smith

Production, “Appellees”) file this Unopposed Joint Motion for Extension of Time

to File Appellees’ Briefs, seeking an additional thirty (30) days to file their

appellate briefs. In support of this Motion, Appellees respectfully show the Court

the following:

A. The Current Deadline

Appellants timely filed their brief on December 17, 2014, after receiving two

thirty-day extensions of their briefing deadline. As a result, Appellees’ brief is

currently due on Friday, January 16, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(b).

B. The Length of Extension Sought

Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b) and 38.6(d),

Appellees seek thirty (30) additional days in which to file their appellate briefs.

Specifically, Appellees seek to change their deadline from January 16, 2015 to

2 1173696 February 17, 2015.1 Appellees seek this extension so that justice may be done in

this appeal, not for improper delay. Appellants do not oppose this extension.

C. Number of Previous Extensions Granted

This is the first extension that Appellees have requested in this appeal.

D. Facts Explaining the Extension Sought

Appellees seek this extension in order to be on the same briefing schedule

that the Balderas defendants have sought in this appeal.2 Furthermore, Smith

Production seeks an extension of time in which to file its appellate brief because its

lead appellate counsel, Kennon L. Wooten, has had several scheduling demands

between the date that Appellants filed their brief and Smith Production’s current

appellate-brief deadline. These scheduling demands include the following:

• Written discovery, document production, and summary judgment motions in Lower Colorado River Authority v. City of Kerrville, Acting by and Through Kerrville Public Utility Board, Cause No. 12-1001-B in the 198th Judicial District Court of Kerr County, Texas;

• Assistance with dismissal of appeals in and nonsuit of Lower Colorado River Authority v. City of Boerne, Texas, Cause No. D-1-GN-12-502 in the 216th Judicial District Court of Kendall County, Texas, and Lower Colorado

1 If the requested extension is granted, the new deadline will fall on a Sunday. The following Monday—February 16, 2015—is President’s Day, a holiday on which the Court will be closed. 2 Rosalinda Salinas Balderas, Fausto Salinas, Elda Salinas Ponce, D-Fox, Ltd., Elodia Salinas, Linda Mandes, Veronica Casas Campbell, and Cynthia M. Villarreal, f/k/a Cindy Casas Reyna (together the “Balderas defendants”) recently requested an extension of time of thirty (30) days in which to file their appellate brief. Like the request herein, the Balderas defendants’ request was unopposed. If the Court grants the Balderas defendants’ request, the extended briefing deadline that Appellees seek herein will match the Balderas defendants’ new briefing deadline. 3 1173696 River Authority v. City of Seguin, Texas, Cause No. D-1-GN-13-000433 in the 53rd Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas;

• Written discovery in Compensation Sciences Enterprises, Ltd. d/b/a/ CSINadler Partners, Inc. v. D. Douglas Brothers, et al., Cause No. D-1-GN- 14-004203 in the 200th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas; and

• Preparation of divorce decrees and parenting plans in two pro bono family- law matters—In the Matter of the Marriage of Jeannie Rodriguez and Casey Barrera and in the Interest of R. N. R. B., Cause No. D-1-AG-10-001954, in the 200th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas, and In the Matter of the Marriage of Cara Michele Wheeler-Najomo and George Onigite Najomo, and In the Interest of Mya Ajiroghene Najomo, a Child, Cause No. D-1-FM-13-005684 in the 250th Judicial District; in Travis County, Texas.

In addition, Thorp et al. seek an extension of time in which to file their

appellate brief because their counsel, Lee Gill, has had several scheduling demands

between the date that Appellants filed their brief and Thorp et al.’s current

appellate-brief deadline. These scheduling demands include the following:

• Written discovery, document production, and summary judgment motions in Jane Guinn Revocable Trust et al vs. Warbonnet Exploration Co. et al, Cause No. 30776, 149th District Court, Brazoria County, Texas; and

• Written discovery, document production, and summary judgment motions in Underground Services Marham, LLC v. Robert Myers et al, Cause No. 13-E- 0218, 130th District Court, Matagorda County, Texas.

The scheduling demands listed above have made it impossible for Appellees

to complete their briefs by their current deadline. This case has not been set for

submission, so this extension will not delay the ultimate resolution of this appeal.

WHEREFORE, Appellees request respectfully that this Court grant this

unopposed Motion and extend their appellate-brief deadline to February 17, 2015. 4 1173696 Respectfully submitted,

SCOTT, DOUGLASS, & MCCONNICO, L.L.P. 600 Congress Avenue, Suite 1500 Austin, Texas 78701-2589 (512) 495-6300 (512) 474-0731 Fax

By: /s/ Kennon L. Wooten Mark W. Hanna State Bar No. 24051764 mhanna@scottdoug.com Kennon L. Wooten State Bar No. 24046624 kwooten@scottdoug.com

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE SMITH PRODUCTION INC.

JONES GILL LLP 6363 Woodway, Suite 1100 Houston, Texas 77057 (713) 652-4068 (713) 651-0716 Fax

By: /s/ Lee S. Gill Lee S. Gill State Bar No. 07921360 info@jonesgill.com

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anna Maria Salinas Saenz v. Thorp Petroleum Corp., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Anna Maria Salinas Saenz v. Thorp Petroleum Corp. (Anna Maria Salinas Saenz v. Thorp Petroleum Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.