Anna Garza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 26, 2018·No. 04-18-00513-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 26, 2018

No. 04-18-00513-CR

Anna GARZA, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR10615 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant’s counsel, Trisha Morales Padia, has filed a motion to withdraw as attorney for appellant which complies with the requirements of Rule 6.5. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. The motion states that counsel represented appellant at trial and does not handle appeals, and requests that a new attorney be appointed to represent appellant on appeal. The motion is GRANTED.

A supplemental clerk’s record has been filed in this court containing an order appointing new counsel to represent appellant on appeal. Accordingly, the appellant’s brief is due within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of October, 2018.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anna Garza v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Anna Garza v. State (Anna Garza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.