Anna Garza v. State
This text of Anna Garza v. State (Anna Garza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 26, 2018
No. 04-18-00513-CR
Anna GARZA, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR10615 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding
ORDER Appellant’s counsel, Trisha Morales Padia, has filed a motion to withdraw as attorney for appellant which complies with the requirements of Rule 6.5. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. The motion states that counsel represented appellant at trial and does not handle appeals, and requests that a new attorney be appointed to represent appellant on appeal. The motion is GRANTED.
A supplemental clerk’s record has been filed in this court containing an order appointing new counsel to represent appellant on appeal. Accordingly, the appellant’s brief is due within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.
_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of October, 2018.
___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anna Garza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anna-garza-v-state-texapp-2018.