Anna D. Koepge v. Carl v. Kromer and Wilbert G. Schwer, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Walter H. Reiger, Deceased

Sixth Circuit

Anna D. Koepge v. Carl v. Kromer and Wilbert G. Schwer, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Walter H. Reiger, Deceased

210 F.2d 655

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 21, 1953

Docket11862

StatusPublished

This text of 210 F.2d 655 (Anna D. Koepge v. Carl v. Kromer and Wilbert G. Schwer, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Walter H. Reiger, Deceased) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anna D. Koepge v. Carl v. Kromer and Wilbert G. Schwer, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Walter H. Reiger, Deceased, 210 F.2d 655 (6th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and upon due consideration it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion and the findings of fact and con-elusions of law of the district court, 118 F.Supp. 571, with the exception of the findings and conclusions with respect to the answer to the seventh question submitted to the court by appellees in their petition for a declaratory judgment, which answer was unnecessary for the court to make in entering the judgment appealed from.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case was heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and upon due consideration it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion and the findings of fact and con-elusions of law of the district court, 118 F.Supp. 571, with the exception of the findings and conclusions with respect to the answer to the seventh question submitted to the court by appellees in their petition for a declaratory judgment, which answer was unnecessary for the court to make in entering the judgment appealed from.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 F.2d 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anna-d-koepge-v-carl-v-kromer-and-wilbert-g-schwer-executors-of-the-ca6-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack