Ann M. McKenzie v. Howard H. Calloway, Robert E. Hampton, Jayne B. Spain, and L. J. Andolsek, in Their Official Capacities
This text of 625 F.2d 754 (Ann M. McKenzie v. Howard H. Calloway, Robert E. Hampton, Jayne B. Spain, and L. J. Andolsek, in Their Official Capacities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Plaintiff appeals the District Court’s grant of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to counts I and II of her complaint, and the dismissal of Count III. Upon consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of counsel together with the record on appeal, the Court concludes that the decision of the District Court is correct.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the District Court’s opinion, which is reported at 456 F.Supp. 590 (E.D.Mich.1978).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
625 F.2d 754, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14892, 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ann-m-mckenzie-v-howard-h-calloway-robert-e-hampton-jayne-b-spain-ca6-1980.