Ann M. McKenzie v. Howard H. Calloway, Robert E. Hampton, Jayne B. Spain, and L. J. Andolsek, in Their Official Capacities

625 F.2d 754, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14892, 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1833
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 13, 1980·No. 78-1493·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Plaintiff appeals the District Court’s grant of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to counts I and II of her complaint, and the dismissal of Count III. Upon consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of counsel together with the record on appeal, the Court concludes that the decision of the District Court is correct.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the District Court’s opinion, which is reported at 456 F.Supp. 590 (E.D.Mich.1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ann M. McKenzie v. Howard H. Calloway, Robert E. Hampton, Jayne B. Spain, and L. J. Andolsek, in Their Official Capacities, 625 F.2d 754, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14892, 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1833 (6th Cir. 1980).

625 F.2d 754 (Ann M. McKenzie v. Howard H. Calloway, Robert E. Hampton, Jayne B. Spain, and L. J. Andolsek, in Their Official Capacities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Giles v. Carlin
641 F. Supp. 629 (E.D. Michigan, 1986)
Stanislaus v. Steorts
530 F. Supp. 72 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)