Ann Goldberg v. A. Van Noy

California Court of Appeal

Ann Goldberg v. A. Van Noy

277 P. 541, 98 Cal. App. 796, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 683

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 30, 1929

DocketDocket No. 3754.

StatusPublished

This text of 277 P. 541 (Ann Goldberg v. A. Van Noy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ann Goldberg v. A. Van Noy, 277 P. 541, 98 Cal. App. 796, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 683 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASES. This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff in an action in ejectment.

This case was tried and determined on the same evidence which was presented in the case of A. Van Noy et al. v. Ann Goldberget al., in which an opinion of this court was rendered and filed this day (see ante, p. 604 [277 P. 538]), and upon the determination of which this appeal depends. Both appeals affect the same real property. In that case a judgment upholding the validity of the foreclosure proceedings and the conveyance of the property to this respondent, Ann Goldberg, was affirmed. No new issues are raised on this appeal. It follows that this respondent is entitled to the possession of the property, together with damages awarded for the unlawful detention thereof.

[1] Upon the authority of A. Van Noy et al. v. AnnGoldberg et al., supra, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Plummer, J., and Finch, P.J., concurred. *Page 797

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM CASES. This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff in an action in ejectment.

This case was tried and determined on the same evidence which was presented in the case of A. Van Noy et al. v. Ann Goldberget al., in which an opinion of this court was rendered and filed this day (see ante, p. 604 [277 P. 538]), and upon the determination of which this appeal depends. Both appeals affect the same real property. In that case a judgment upholding the validity of the foreclosure proceedings and the conveyance of the property to this respondent, Ann Goldberg, was affirmed. No new issues are raised on this appeal. It follows that this respondent is entitled to the possession of the property, together with damages awarded for the unlawful detention thereof.

[1] Upon the authority of A. Van Noy et al. v. AnnGoldberg et al., supra, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Plummer, J., and Finch, P.J., concurred. *Page 797

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 P. 541, 98 Cal. App. 796, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ann-goldberg-v-a-van-noy-calctapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack