Ann Arbor Bank v. Stegeman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Ann Arbor Bank v. Stegeman

208 N.W.2d 517, 46 Mich. App. 685, 1973 Mich. App. LEXIS 1248

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 26, 1973

DocketDocket No. 14530

StatusPublished

This text of 208 N.W.2d 517 (Ann Arbor Bank v. Stegeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ann Arbor Bank v. Stegeman, 208 N.W.2d 517, 46 Mich. App. 685, 1973 Mich. App. LEXIS 1248 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinions

Danhof, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the balance due on a promissory note dated September 1, 1967 and signed by the defendant, John C. Stegeman, individually and as attorney in fact for Lois U. Stegeman, his wife. Both parties moved for summary judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2. The court granted summary judgment for the plaintiff and defendants appeal.

An examination of the record and briefs discloses that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and summary judgment for the plaintiff was proper.

Affirmed, costs to the plaintiff.

Bashara, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI