Anlage v. Citytrust

517 So. 2d 37, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2680, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123, 1987 WL 1772
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 24, 1987·No. No. 87-1029·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the trial court that the appellants maintained frivolous litigation against the appellee so as to justify an award of attorney’s fees under section 57.-105, Florida Statutes (1985). See Keen v. Bernardo, 452 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Friedman v. Backman, 453 So.2d 938 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

[38] We reject the appellee s contention on cross-appeal that it was entitled to attorney’s fees for the services rendered in preparing the application for fees under section 57.105. See Service Ins. Co. v. Gulf Steel Corp., 412 So.2d 967 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anlage v. Citytrust, 517 So. 2d 37, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2680, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123, 1987 WL 1772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

517 So. 2d 37 (Anlage v. Citytrust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keen v. Bernardo
452 So. 2d 1133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Friedman v. Backman
453 So. 2d 938 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Service Insurance Co. v. Gulf Steel Corp.
412 So. 2d 967 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)