Anlage v. Citytrust
This text of 517 So. 2d 37 (Anlage v. Citytrust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We agree with the trial court that the appellants maintained frivolous litigation against the appellee so as to justify an award of attorney’s fees under section 57.-105, Florida Statutes (1985). See Keen v. Bernardo, 452 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Friedman v. Backman, 453 So.2d 938 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
[38]*38We reject the appellee s contention on cross-appeal that it was entitled to attorney’s fees for the services rendered in preparing the application for fees under section 57.105. See Service Ins. Co. v. Gulf Steel Corp., 412 So.2d 967 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
517 So. 2d 37, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2680, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123, 1987 WL 1772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anlage-v-citytrust-fladistctapp-1987.