Ankerman v. Mancuso
835 A.2d 471, 266 Conn. 925, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 513
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 4, 2003
DocketSC 17086
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 835 A.2d 471 (Ankerman v. Mancuso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ankerman v. Mancuso, 835 A.2d 471, 266 Conn. 925, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 513 (Colo. 2003).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 480 (AC 23369), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly refused to enforce a secondary mortgage loan transaction made by an attorney with a client despite its finding that the transaction violated the public policy underlying rule 1.8 (j) of the Rules of Professional Conduct?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ankerman v. Mancuso
860 A.2d 244 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
835 A.2d 471, 266 Conn. 925, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ankerman-v-mancuso-conn-2003.