Anker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Anker v. State

561 So. 2d 467, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3753, 1990 WL 68710

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 23, 1990

DocketNo. 87-02972

StatusPublished

This text of 561 So. 2d 467 (Anker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anker v. State, 561 So. 2d 467, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3753, 1990 WL 68710 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Francis Harold Anker, was convicted of burglary of a structure and petit theft. He raises two points on appeal. We find merit only in the second issue.

The trial court found appellant unable to pay and orally directed that no costs be assessed against him. Yet, the written judgment assessed costs. This was clearly a mistake and the costs provision should be stricken.

We affirm appellant’s conviction, but direct that the costs provision be stricken.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB and ' PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Francis Harold Anker, was convicted of burglary of a structure and petit theft. He raises two points on appeal. We find merit only in the second issue.

The trial court found appellant unable to pay and orally directed that no costs be assessed against him. Yet, the written judgment assessed costs. This was clearly a mistake and the costs provision should be stricken.

We affirm appellant’s conviction, but direct that the costs provision be stricken.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB and ' PARKER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 So. 2d 467, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3753, 1990 WL 68710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anker-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.