Ankenbrandt ex rel. L. R. v. Richards

502 U.S. 1023
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ankenbrandt ex rel. L. R. v. Richards. Read the opinion of the Court — 504 U.S. 689
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 10, 1992·No. No. 91-367·Published

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following questions: “(1) Is there a domestic relations exception to federal jurisdiction? (2) If so, does it permit a district court to abstain from exercising diversity jurisdiction over a tort action for damages? (3) Did the District Court in this case err in abstaining from exercising jurisdiction under the doctrine of Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37 (1971)?” Petitioner’s brief and the joint appendix are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., February 14, 1992. Respondents’ brief is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., March 5, 1992. Any reply brief is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel in accordance with this Court’s Rule 25.3. Oral argument is scheduled for the March session beginning March 23, 1992.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ankenbrandt ex rel. L. R. v. Richards, 502 U.S. 1023 (1992).

502 U.S. 1023 (Ankenbrandt ex rel. L. R. v. Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Younger v. Harris
401 U.S. 37 (Supreme Court, 1971)