Ank v. Ank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ank v. Ank

497 S.W.3d 859, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 875, 2016 WL 4597487

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 6, 2016·No. No. ED 103747·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anthony D. Ank (“Father”) appeals from that portion of the trial court’s judgment granting Candy L. Ank’s (“Mother”) [860] motion modifying Father’s visitation with his children from unsupervised ■ visitation to supervised visitation. Father contends that the trial court’s judgment ordering supervised visitation erroneously applied the law and is against the weight of the evidence. Finding that no error of law appears and that the judgment is not against the weight of the evidence, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anthony D. Ank (“Father”) appeals from that portion of the trial court’s judgment granting Candy L. Ank’s (“Mother”) [860] motion modifying Father’s visitation with his children from unsupervised ■ visitation to supervised visitation. Father contends that the trial court’s judgment ordering supervised visitation erroneously applied the law and is against the weight of the evidence. Finding that no error of law appears and that the judgment is not against the weight of the evidence, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Ank v. Ank, 497 S.W.3d 859, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 875, 2016 WL 4597487 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

497 S.W.3d 859 (Ank v. Ank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.